Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Free, publicly-accessible full text available October 1, 2026
-
Nectar contains antimicrobial constituents including hydrogen peroxide, yet it is unclear how widespread nectar hydrogen peroxide might be among plant species or how effective it is against common nectar microbes.Here, we surveyed 45 flowering plant species across 23 families and reviewed the literature to assess the field‐realistic range of nectar hydrogen peroxide (Aim 1). We experimentally explored whether plant defense hormones increase nectar hydrogen peroxide (Aim 2). Further, we tested the hypotheses that variation in microbial tolerance to peroxide is predicted by the microbe isolation environment (Aim 3); increasing hydrogen peroxide in flowers alters microbial abundance and community assembly (Aim 4), and that the microbial community context affects microbial tolerance to peroxide (Aim 5).Peroxide in sampled plants ranged from undetectable toc3000 μM, with 50% of species containing less than 100 μM. Plant defensive hormones did not affect hydrogen peroxide in floral nectar, but enzymatically upregulated hydrogen peroxide significantly reduced microbial growth.Together, our results suggest that nectar peroxide is a common but not pervasive antimicrobial defense among nectar‐producing plants. Microbes vary in tolerance and detoxification ability, and co‐growth can facilitate the survival and growth of less tolerant species, suggesting a key role for community dynamics in the microbial colonization of nectar.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available May 1, 2026
-
Wild pollinator declines are increasingly linked to pesticide exposure, yet it is unclear how intraspecific differences contribute to observed variation in sensitivity, and the role gut microbes play in the sensitivity of wild bees is largely unexplored. Here, we investigate site-level differences in survival and microbiome structure of a wild bumble bee exposed to multiple pesticides, both individually and in combination. We collected wildBombus vosnesenskiiforagers (N= 175) from an alpine meadow, a valley lake shoreline and a suburban park and maintained them on a diet containing a herbicide (glyphosate), a fungicide (tebuconazole), an insecticide (imidacloprid) or a combination of these chemicals. Alpine bees had the highest overall survival, followed by shoreline bees then suburban bees. This was in part explained by body size differences across sites and the presence of conopid parasitoids at two of the sites. Notably, site of origin impacted bee survival on the herbicide, fungicide and combination treatment. We did not find evidence of gut microbiome differences across pesticide treatment, nor a site-by-treatment interaction. Regardless, the survival differences we observed emphasize the importance of considering population of origin when studying pesticide toxicity of wild bees.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available June 1, 2026
-
Abstract The microbial composition of stored food can influence its stability and determine the microbial species consumed by the organism feeding on it. Many bee species store nectar and pollen in provisions constructed to feed developing offspring. Previous work has shown variation in provision microbiome among bee populations, yet whether this variation is determined by the pollen types within provisions, variation between bee species at the same nesting sites, or geographic distance was unclear. Here, we sampled two species of co-occurring cavity nesting bees in the genusOsmiaat 13 sites across the Sierra foothills in California and examined the composition of pollen, fungi and bacteria found in their provisions across sites. As expected, pollen, bacterial and fungal composition exhibited significant turnover between bees and sites, with bee species characterized by particular pollen and microbial species. Pollen composition explained 15% of variation in bacterial composition and ∼30% of variation in fungal composition, whereas spatial distance among sites explained minimal additional variation. Symbiotic or bee-specialized microbe generaAscosphaera,SodalisandWolbachiashowed contrasting patterns of association with pollen composition, suggesting distinct acquisition and transmission routes for each. Comparing provisions from both bee species comprised of the same pollens points to environmental acquisition rather than bee species as a key factor shaping the early stages of the bee microbiome inOsmia. The patterns we observed also contrast withApilactobacillus-dominated provision microbiome in other solitary bee species, suggesting variable mechanisms of microbial assembly in stored food among bee species.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available March 18, 2026
-
Abstract Bumble bees can benefit from fungi, though the mechanisms underlying these benefits remain unknown and could include nutrition, resource supplementation, or pathogen protection. We tested how adding living yeasts or their metabolic products toBombus impatiensdiets in a factorial experiment affects microcolony performance, including survival, reproduction, and pathogen presence. We additionally assessed effects of yeast treatments on diet (nectar and pollen) chemical composition using untargeted metabolomics. Yeasts impacted microcolony reproduction and survival, but effects depended on source colony. Colonies containing the putative pathogenAspergillusshowed reduced reproduction, but yeast treatments reducedAspergillusprevalence. Yeast treatments altered chemical composition of nectar and pollen, but most distinguishing compounds were unidentified. Our results suggest limited direct effects of yeasts via nutrition, resource supplementation, or modification of diets, instead suggesting that yeasts may benefit bees through interactions with the pathogens includingAspergillus. Overall, the effects of yeast supplementation are context-dependent, and more research is necessary to better understand the factors important in determining their impacts on bee hosts.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available November 8, 2025
-
Summary Flower-sourced assembly of seed microbiota remains an understudied ecological process. Here, we investigated the floral transmission pathway for bacterial acquisition by developing seeds of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Comparison of stigma- and seed-associated bacterial communities from field-grownC. lanatusrevealed significant overlap: up to 40% of the bacterial diversity that was detected in seed was also found on stigmas. In a field pollinator exclusion experiment, honeybee visitation to flower stigmas had no significant effect on bacterial community composition in seeds. Among a collection of bacterial isolates from stigmas and seeds in the field, more than half (57%) were able to transmit to seeds after inoculation onto stigmas under laboratory conditions. Interestingly, for most bacterial strains, fruit set rates increased after floral inoculation, and in some cases even in the absence of transmission to the seed. We also found that bacterial isolates from watermelon stigmas and seeds had variable (i.e. positive or negative) effects on seed germination and seedling emergence. Our findings highlight the contribution of floral transmission to seed microbiota assembly and its consequences for plant fitness.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available February 17, 2026
-
Fire blight is a devastating disease affecting pome fruit trees that is caused by Erwinia amylovora and leads to substantial annual losses worldwide. While antibiotic-based management approaches like streptomycin can be effective, there are concerns over evolved resistance of the pathogen and non-target effects on beneficial microbes and insects. Using microbial biological control agents (mBCAs) to combat fire blight has promise, but variable performance necessitates the discovery of more effective solutions. Here we used a niche-based predictive framework to assess the strength of priority effects exerted by prospective mBCAs, and the mechanisms behind growth suppression in floral nectar. Through in vitro and in vivo assays, we show that antagonist impacts on nectar pH and sucrose concentration were the primary predictors of priority effects. Surprisingly, overlap in amino acid use, and the degree of phylogenetic relatedness between mBCA and Erwinia did not significantly predict pathogen suppression in vitro, suggesting that competition for limited shared resources played a lesser role than alterations in the chemical environment created by the initial colonizing species. We also failed to detect an association between our measures of in vitro and in vivo Erwinia suppression, suggesting other mechanisms may dictate mBCA establishment and efficacy in flowers, including priming of host defenses.more » « less
-
Abstract Bee–fungus associations are common, and while most studies focus on entomopathogens, emerging evidence suggests that bees associate with a variety of symbiotic fungi that can influence bee behavior and health. Here, we review nonpathogenic fungal taxa associated with different bee species and bee-related habitats. We synthesize results of studies examining fungal effects on bee behavior, development, survival, and fitness. We find that fungal communities differ across habitats, with some groups restricted mostly to flowers (Metschnikowia), while others are present almost exclusively in stored provisions (Zygosaccharomyces). Starmerella yeasts are found in multiple habitats in association with many bee species. Bee species differ widely in the abundance and identity of fungi hosted. Functional studies suggest that yeasts affect bee foraging, development, and pathogen interactions, though few bee and fungal taxa have been examined in this context. Rarely, fungi are obligately beneficial symbionts of bees, whereas most are facultative bee associates with unknown or ecologically contextual effects. Fungicides can reduce fungal abundance and alter fungal communities associated with bees, potentially disrupting bee–fungi associations. We recommend that future study focus on fungi associated with non-honeybee species and examine multiple bee life stages to document fungal composition, abundance, and mechanistic effects on bees.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
